Privacy Seminar Evaluation Questionnaire

The following questionnaire is concerned with your perceptions of the quality of the audio and video delivery in the seminar that you have just watched. It will address your overall impressions of, and attitudes towards, the videoconferencing technology used.

Your answers will help determine the suitability of the technology for this type of activity. All answers you give will be confidential and stored anonymously.

This questionnaire focuses on the technological aspects of your experience.
 

We would appreciate it if you could provide the following information :

Age range (please circle):

18-25

26-35

36-45

45+

 

Education/career background (e.g. business, computer science, psychology):

 

Have you ever experienced a seminar delivered through videoconferencing before?

 

If you answered yes, please briefly describe your experience:

 

 

Now please turn over and complete the questionnaire
 
 

1. General Issues
 
 

1.1 How would you rate the overall quality of the audio in the seminar?

(Please circle the appropriate number)
 
Very good
Good
Neither good nor poor
Poor
Very Poor
1
2
3
4
5
 

1.2 We would also like you to give a numerical rating of the overall quality of the audio in the seminar where 0 = Very poor quality and 100 = Very good quality. Please place a VERTICAL mark on the scale below indicating how the quality seemed to you.

 

 
 

 

 

1.3 How would you rate the overall adequacy of the audio in the seminar?
 
Completely adequate
Adequate
Neither
Inadequate
Completely inadequate
1
2
3
4
5
 
 
 

1.4 We would also like you to provide a numerical rating of the overall adequacy of the audio for the seminar. For example, if you feel that the audio met none of the needs of the seminar, you should place a mark at 0 on the scale below. If you felt the audio met all of the needs of the seminar, you should place a mark at 100. If you felt the adequacy of the audio was somewhere in between, you should mark accordingly.

 

 

 

 

1.5 Did you feel that the quality of the audio varied during the seminar?

If you answered Yes, what impact did this have on your understanding of the seminar?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

1.6 In general, how easy was it to hear the seminar speaker?
 
Very easy
Easy
Neither
Difficult
Very difficult
1
2
3
4
5
 
 

1.7 Did you feel it required more effort on your behalf to understand what the speaker was saying than it might do in a face-to-face settting?

 

1.8 How appropriate do you feel this method of delivery was for the subject matter of the seminar?

 
Highly appropriate
Appropriate
Neither
Inappropriate
Highly inappropriate
1
2
3
4
5
 
 



 

2 Video issues

2.1 Were all of the displayed video images large enough?

If No, please describe which of the video images you felt was displayed at an insufficient size, and why:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

2.2 During the seminar, was the size of any of the images altered at any point ?

If Yes, what impact did this have on your impression of the seminar?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.3 Please rate the quality of the different video streams, and provide a numerical rating from 0-100 where 0 = Very poor and 100 = Very good:
 
Seminar speaker (Anne Adams) 
 
Very good
Good
Neither
Poor
Very poor
1
2
3
4
5
 

Numerical rating ____

Demonstration video clip  
 
Very good 
Good
Neither
Poor
Very poor
1
2
3
4
5
 

Numerical rating ____

Audience at Glasgow 
 
Very good
Good
Neither
Poor
Very poor
1
2
3
4
5
 

Numerical rating ____

Audience at UCL 
 
Very good
Good
Neither
Poor
Very poor
1
2
3
4
5
 

Numerical rating ____

 

 

 

2.4     Please rate the overall adequacy of the different video streams, and provide a numerical rating from 0-100 where 0 = Video met none of the needs of the seminar, and 100 = Video met all the needs of the seminar.
 
Seminar speaker (Anne Adams) 
 
Completely adequate
Adequate
Neither
Inadequate
Completely inadequate
1
2
3
4
5

Numerical rating ____

Demonstration video clip  
 
Completely adeqaute
Adequate
Neither
Inadequate
Completely inadequate
1
2
3
4
5

Numerical rating ____

Audience at Glasgow 
 
Completely inadequate
Adequate
Neither
Inadequate
Completely inadequate
1
2
3
4
5

Numerical rating ____

Audience at UCL 
 
Completely adequate
Adequate
Neither
Inadequate
Completely inadequate
1
2
3
4
5

Numerical rating ____

 
 

2.5 If you have any specific comments regarding the FRAME RATE, FIELD OF VIEW OR LATENCY (DELAY) of the different video streams, please note them below:

Frame rate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field of view --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latency --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Frame rate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field of view --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latency --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Frame rate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field of view --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latency --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

Frame rate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Field of view --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Latency --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
 
Thankyou very much!