William Sommerfeld (email@example.com)
12 Nov 88 06:09:58 GMT
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, somebody logged in as root writes:
> Huh? If you let anyone on your Ethernet cable with a PC you've
> basically just given up any hope for security. Even active
> methods like Kerberos will not protect you from people who
> just listen to eg TCP sessions on the cable.
So, "you can look, but you can't touch". For the most part, that's
good enough for academia, once you train people to know not to type
passwords in the clear over a network, which is admittedly easier said
Kerberos allows the networked applications to securely exchange a
session key; this can allow them to encrypt any "sensitive" data they
send, or attach an encrypted checksum to each request in a connection.
There isn't much use of this yet, but I suspect that it will become
somewhat more common in the future.
Given the speed of most software DES encryption implementations, you
pay dearly for encrypting entire packets (with an order of magnitude
of 100s of milliseconds/packet on each end of a conversation). If
you're less concerned about security, you can always use a weaker but
faster encryption method, such as XORing the data with bits from a
pseudo-random number generator seeded with the session key.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:44:30 GMT