Re: is there a need for class A addresses?

Robert J. Reschly Jr. (reschly@BRL.MIL)
Tue, 1 Nov 88 23:16:31 EST


   There is a good reason for arguing against a cluster of class B (or C)
addresses over one A (or B). When one is in a situation where there is
one portal (or just a few portals) into a cluster of networks, and those
networks are richly interconnected, then subnetting is a win. For
networks outside the portal, only the underlying network needs to be
known to make routing decisions. With clusters of non-subnetted networks,
each network needs to be known outside the portal. Adding one address
to the routing mess is vastly preferrable to adding many.

Phone: (301)278-6678 AV: 298-6678 FTS: 939-6678
Arpa: reschly@BRL.MIL (or BRL.ARPA) UUCP: ...!brl-smoke!reschly
Postal: Robert J. Reschly Jr.
        Advanced Computer Systems Team
        Systems Engineering and Concepts Analysis Division
        U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory
        ATTN: SLCBR-SE (Reschly)
        APG, MD 21005-5066 (Hey, *I* don't make 'em up!)

**** For a good time, call: (303) 499-7111. Seriously! ****

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:43:57 GMT