John Carter (email@example.com)
Thu, 27 Oct 88 11:08:04 CDT
I've made similar measurements on the similar machines, and come to
roughty the same conclusions. My measurements are in the context of
the V operating systems interkernel protocols, but for raw hardware speed
comparisons, this shouldn't matter.
Between two SUN-3/50 or SUN-3/60's (both with the LANCE interface),
I can sustain about 8.2 Mbps user-to-user performance (not source/chargen,
sink/discard). From a SUN-3/180 (somewhat slower than the 2/180, but
with the same Intel ethernet interface) to a SUN-3/60, I can sustain
slightly more than 6.0 Mbps user-to-user performance. All these
measurements are for 1024 byte data packets, with 80 byte V interkernel
headers (ouch!!!) and 14 byte ethernet headers. Factoring the headers
in, the SUN-3/50 -> SUN-3/50 throughput is 9.0 Mbps and SUN-3/180 ->
SUN-3/50 throughput is 6.5 Mbps. Roughly the same raw numbers...
The SUN-2/50's (which use the Intel interface, but are significantly
slower) can maintain around 4.7-5.1 Mbps in or out. These are very rough,
since I haven't fully debugged the implementation on the 2's.
[ The following is opinion and shouldn't be construed as gospel. ]
I also have only put a little bit of effort into determining the exact
cause of the disparity. I had made the same decision you had regarding
the 82586's DMA ability, namely, it isn't very good (and can only sustain
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:43:57 GMT