Usenet Administration (firstname.lastname@example.org)
27 Sep 88 23:27:33 GMT
In article <8809260302.AA11541@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> dcrocker@TWG.COM (Dave Crocker) writes:
>One of the emerging major benefits of Streams is its utility in a
>multi-processor environment. Properly implemented, streams modules may
>operate in DIFFERENT address spaces. The only shared memory that is needed
>is for message-passing and data-buffers.
This suggests that a Streams module may be written in
a special way to run in a multi-processor environment, whereas
perhaps it is the implementation of the Streams facility that would
most require careful design for multi-processor operation. The
modules themselves should be oblivious to the nature of the cpu/s,
especially if the advantages of standardization are to be maintained
(given that the existing Streams specification from AT&T do not
allow for multi-processor operation).
It would be interesting to know of approaches taken to implement
Streams for multi-processor operation.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:43:31 GMT