proliferating queues


jam@radc-lonex.arpa
Mon, 12 Sep 88 09:16:07 EDT


alternate subject: Does TCP/IP "comform" to ISO/OSI?

> I didn't hear (read) a second to the motion nor a call for a vote on the
> motion. I might suffer withdrawal symptoms from contrived erudition and
> misspelled words should you terminate your exchange of missives at this
> instance. On the basis of the dispatches promulgated by yourself and
> Marshall, one can only hope that English (American or British) is a second
> language and that you can express yourselves more elegantly in Ada, ALGOL,
> BASIC, BLISS (-16 or -32), C, COBOL, FORTRAN, LISP, JOVIAL, SNOBOL, WATFOR,
> WATFIV, etc.. I probably should include TECO and any number of assemblers
> in the preceding list.
>
> Merton

I for one will second the motion, though I'm not sure if we could actually
call for a vote. I don't really think that a forum on tcp-ip is the place
to attack it. I'm here because I use tcp-ip (the fact that I like it is
beside the point), and having to wade through language that only a supreme
court justice enjoys is a drag.

Joel

P.S.

SNOBOL is probably the best choice for communications, considering the
rate this is expanding at...

Merton, are the waitresses at Westlake Jack's still as awsome as they used
to be?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:43:15 GMT