John G Dobnick (email@example.com)
10 Jul 88 06:08:51 GMT
I insert foot in mouth in article <I insert foot in mouth in article <6184@uwmcsd1.UUCP>, where I say:
> This ["-1" is all 1 bits] is an easy trap to fall into, and vendors
> especially should be particularly careful about this.
Jon Postel in article <8807090341.AA04490@bel.isi.edu> replies:
> ... please read RFC-1009 pages 14, 15, 35, 36, 44, 45.
Indeed, RFC 1009 states in the text that "-1" is "all one bits". I stand
corrected on this matter.
Assuming "-1" is "all ones" is, to me, a 2's complement bias. Coming from a
1's complement environment, I misinterpreted this and shot my mouth off.
Sorry, folks. I'm just learning about all this network stuff.
[I still have a problem with some wording in RFC1009, but am not sure this
is the proper place to raise it. Can someone advise me on this?]
-- John G Dobnick Computing Services Division @ University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee UUCP: <backbone>!uwvax!uwmcsd1!jgd INTERNET: firstname.lastname@example.org-- John G Dobnick Computing Services Division @ University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee UUCP: <backbone>!uwvax!uwmcsd1!jgd INTERNET: email@example.com
"Knowing how things work is the basis for appreciation, and is thus a source of civilized delight." -- William Safire
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:42:50 GMT