Sat, 7 May 88 11:11:58 EDT
In message <In message <1607@erix.UUCP>, Per Hedeland writes:
> a) It appears that the intended use of subnetting assumes that all the "subs"
> of a "whole" net are interconnected, i.e. the backbone and the client
> segments in our case should be "subs" of the same "whole" - in particular,
> "automatic" routing by means of routed (which we desire) will not work
> otherwise, as far as I can understand.
Yes, that has to be true - you can only advertise your full network,
not your subnets, to the Internet at large.
> b) "Subs" of a given "whole" must be of equal size.
This is a mistaken assumption. There is nothing that prevents you
from using subnets of different sizes on a given net, except for
software that isn't up to speed on subnetting (notably SunOS 3.x).
For example, our campus-wide network is a class B sized subnet of a
class A network. The Merit network itself is a class A/2 subnet, and
Univ of Michigan has parceled out a number of class C-sized subnets.
I plan to pass out class C-sized subnets of our network (or possibly
smaller) to several other campus Ethernets, as soon as we get SunOS
Doug Nelson firstname.lastname@example.org
Michigan State University email@example.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:42:13 GMT