Re: SLIP working group?

Tue, 19 Apr 88 12:38:27 EDT


There are lots of schemes to deal with the unfairness issue I mentioned,
the most attractive of which may be based on schedule-to-deadline
principles you mention. While fragmentation can be used to reduce
latency, you have to be careful how the fragmentation is done. Those
implementations I know about transmit all fragments of a gram one after
the other, which would defeat the purpose. Fuzzballs (and maybe others
I don't know about) requeue the datagram (with updated fragmentation info)
after each fragment transmission. This results in a two-tier discipline;
FB(n) (FIFO order in each priority queue) for grams less than the MTU
and RR (round-robin in each priority queue) otherwise. Yes, the thought
has struck me that actual queue priority could be adjusted for each
fragment and also elapsed time on the queue.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:41:56 GMT