Ken Leonard --> kleonard@firstname.lastname@example.org (email@example.com)
22 Feb 88 19:04:22 GMT
In article <[SRI-NIC.ARPA]Fri,.19.Feb.88.06:21:34.PST.STJOHNS> STJOHNS@SRI-NIC.ARPA writes:
>more than once) is that is leaves them liable to a law suite [sic].
>results, a vendor could sue and most probably win if I got up and
>said its product didn't work. Unfortunately, passing the formal
>testing is no guarantee of being able to interoperate.
Which is why the DCA/NBS "ProtoLab NVLAP" program needs our support. The
output from a ProtoLab test suite of a protocol implementation IS NOT JUST
a good/nogood tag; it is a COMPLETE and TRACEABLE standard-compliance
report. Which means that any potential user can evaluate, in light of
OWN/REAL/ACCEPTABLE/NECESSARY task to be accomplished, whether or
not to buy a particular implementation.
And, properly done, the ProtoLab results show a HECK OF A LOT about the
chances of interoperability, too.
Regardz, [Engineering: The Art of Science]
This represents neither my employer's opinion nor my own: It's just something
I overheard in a low-class bar down by the docks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:40:43 GMT