31 Jul 87 16:30:00 GMT
>/* Written 1:30 pm Jul 29, 1987 by DCP@QUABBIN.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM in uxc.cso.uiuc.edu:comp.protocols.tcp-ip */
> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 87 23:32:20 EDT
> From: "James B. VanBokkelen" <JBVB@AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
> I've heard nothing about aberrant behavior on Ether, so apparently they're
> only punishing their own pioneering customers at the moment....
> Maybe they're just trying to go one up on DEC? Remember that DEC
> violates the spirit of the Ethernet hardware address by forcing the
> Ethernet address to be algorithmically determined by the DECnet address,
> resulting in Ethernet addresses which do not indicate the vendor of
> hardware interface, as well as not ensuring globally unique addresses.
DECnet uses the node address to set the least significant 16 bits of the
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:38:48 GMT