Re: GOSIP


Marshall Rose (mrose@nrtc-gremlin.arpa)
Wed, 04 Mar 87 13:32:09 -0800


    Well Mike, what can I say? You got me on a technicality. Final
    defense: It is my belief that the scope and applicability sections
    of the GOSIP spec are mis-stated in that they are not consistent
    with what I thought was going on at the meeting. Perhaps I am wrong
    and have misinterpreted what was agreed at the last meeting. If I
    am correct in this assumption, then these two sections should be
    fixed in the final copy. If this is done, then GOSIP is a fine
    thing.

    If, on the other had, I am wrong, and these sections are to be an
    accurate representation of GOSIP's intent, then I have wasted
    everyone's time trying to defend something which is patently wrong
    (as most of your arguments point out) and I'll appologize.

    However, since none of the people in the know have commented on our
    discussion, it is difficult for me to gauge how right/wrong I am.

/mtr



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:37:43 GMT