Marshall Rose (email@example.com)
Wed, 04 Mar 87 13:32:09 -0800
Well Mike, what can I say? You got me on a technicality. Final
defense: It is my belief that the scope and applicability sections
of the GOSIP spec are mis-stated in that they are not consistent
with what I thought was going on at the meeting. Perhaps I am wrong
and have misinterpreted what was agreed at the last meeting. If I
am correct in this assumption, then these two sections should be
fixed in the final copy. If this is done, then GOSIP is a fine
If, on the other had, I am wrong, and these sections are to be an
accurate representation of GOSIP's intent, then I have wasted
everyone's time trying to defend something which is patently wrong
(as most of your arguments point out) and I'll appologize.
However, since none of the people in the know have commented on our
discussion, it is difficult for me to gauge how right/wrong I am.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:37:43 GMT