re: How to IP & ARP on 802 nets

Wed, 3 Sep 86 23:45 PDT

I have two problems with this scheme. Unfortunately, both are caused by
the SNAP, which seems to be the part closest to being fully blessed.

The first problem is the 24 bit "organization" code. A 24 bit field
seems excessively clumsy. (In the immortal words of 1822, it's "not
particularly convenient for anyone.") Not too serious, but it fits well
with my solution.

The second problem is that this plan works great with 802.2 type 1
headers, but 802.2 type 2 messages add an additional byte to the normal
802.2 header. If the SNAP scheme is unchanged in this situation, we
find ourselves with the new ethernet type field shifted back to an odd
byte and our IP packet gets out of alignment. Does anyone know what
happens to the SNAP in type 2? I don't know if it's feasible to send IP
packets over type 2 802.2, but if it is we need to worry about this.

I have a solution that solves both of these problems. Instead of a 24
bit organization code, break it into an eight bit unused pad field
followed by a 16 bit organization code. (Happily, this field is then
aligned to an even byte.) In type 2 802.2 packets, this unused eight
bits becomes the second byte of the 802.2 control field, but the other
four bytes of the SNAP (two for the organization code and two for the
new ethernet type field) remain the same. So the 802.2 header would be
the same size (eight bytes) for both type 1 and type 2 packets, rather
than have the three byte header for type 1 and the four byte header for
type 2 in the currently published protocol.

Of course, this assumes we have anything to say about this. Since this
doesn't appear to be the case, i guess it's too late to avoid these

Looking back on this note, i realize that someone without familiarity
with 802.2 might be confused. I think i can lessen the confusion by
explaining that 802.2 packets, including these three or four (or eight)
byte headers, ride inside 802.3 packets, which have the familiar 14
byte ethernet header, with the ethernet type field replaced by the
famous 802.3 length field.

While i have the floor, at the TCP workshop, i think i heard twice that
802.3 lengths less than 60 are illegal, and, therefore, fall under the
famous ethernet footnote, which says that any illegal lengths can be
interpreted however the implementation wants (thus allowing previous
ethernet implementations to continue to operate on the same network as
802.3 impelmentations). If i heard correctly, i'd like to point out
that this is not correct. Lengths less than 60 are legal in 802.3. In
fact, it's the need to express a packet smaller than 60 bytes in a
hardware environment which doesn't allow transmission of packets less
60 bytes in length that is the justification for the length field in
the first place. (A packet can be padded out to 60 bytes while the
true length of the packet is preserved via the length field.)

                                                don provan

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:36:35 GMT