Re: Port Collisions


Benson I. Margulies (Margulies@SCRC-YUKON.ARPA)
Wed, 14 May 86 07:49 EDT


    Date: Wed, 14 May 86 02:37:25 PDT
    From: Murray.pa@Xerox.COM

    One word of caution.... Xerox managed to get off on the wrong foot in
    the Ethernet packet type assignment business.

    If you administer a group of ports, I suggest that the ground rules
    include publishing a who-to-contact as well as a simple (one line?)
    description of its function. Otherwise people will flame at you when you
    won't answer questions.

Fine with me.

    The proprietary aspect might complicate that attitude. I don't think
    that objection really holds water. It's too easy to look at the bits on
    an ethernet.

I expect that proprietary protocols will be fairly rare. Mostly, I
expect that people just won't have the time or inclination to document.
I really cannot see why someone would insist on a listing of `Foobar
Company proprietary protocol 1'.

    I like your second suggestion, but somebody is bound to ignore it
    because it takes an extra packet to get started.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:36:06 GMT