Benson I. Margulies (Margulies@SCRC-YUKON.ARPA)
Wed, 14 May 86 07:49 EDT
Date: Wed, 14 May 86 02:37:25 PDT
One word of caution.... Xerox managed to get off on the wrong foot in
the Ethernet packet type assignment business.
If you administer a group of ports, I suggest that the ground rules
include publishing a who-to-contact as well as a simple (one line?)
description of its function. Otherwise people will flame at you when you
won't answer questions.
Fine with me.
The proprietary aspect might complicate that attitude. I don't think
that objection really holds water. It's too easy to look at the bits on
I expect that proprietary protocols will be fairly rare. Mostly, I
expect that people just won't have the time or inclination to document.
I really cannot see why someone would insist on a listing of `Foobar
Company proprietary protocol 1'.
I like your second suggestion, but somebody is bound to ignore it
because it takes an extra packet to get started.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu Mar 09 2000 - 14:36:06 GMT